Zablonski: U.S. attempts to aid Syrian refugees prove inadequate

As a devastating civil war and the spread of the Islamic State displaces nearly half of the people living in Syria, several European nations are scrambling to ease the crisis.

France, Germany and Sweden granted asylum to a combined 100,000 refugees in 2014.  The United States, however, has accepted only 1,500 of the estimated 4 million Syrian refugees since 2011. For a nation that was built upon immigration—and one that prides itself on international leadership—this is both hypocritical and unacceptable.

The recent media attention surrounding the migration of Syrians has largely been sparked by several disturbing cases in which dozens of refugees have been killed. For instance, 71 were found dead in the back of an abandoned truck in Austria on Aug. 26—a day after 54 people drowned in an attempt to cross the Mediterranean Sea. In a similar incident, the bodies of 12 refugees washed up on a Turkish beach on Sept. 2, including 3-year-old Aylan Kurdi.

Naturally, the U.S. has responded to this disaster, as any self-proclaimed international leader would. One would think that the U.S. would make meaningful strides to curb the issue. Surely the U.S. would set an even better example than countries such as Germany, who has valiantly pledged to accept 800,000 refugees this year. But this is not the case.

The White House announced a plan on Thursday Sept. 10 to admit just 10,000 refugees in the upcoming fiscal year beginning on Oct. 1. While this is a dramatic increase for the U.S., it seems incredibly weak considering German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced that there is no legal limit for the amount of refugees that can enter Germany.

In response to the meager U.S. pledge, Democratic presidential candidate Martin O’Malley said, "If Germany—a country with one-fourth our population—can accept 800,000 refugees this year, certainly we—the nation of immigrants and refugees—can do more."

Although presidential candidates are quick to criticize, now is an appropriate time to do it. O’Malley’s statement came right after the Obama administration announced a plan to help settle an underwhelming percentage Syrian refugees.

This plan also exhibits a dangerous trend for the U.S. regarding its role in international leadership and conflict resolution. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres has asked governments around the world to help resettle 130,000 Syrians over the next two years. According to the BBC News, the U.S. has typically taken half of the number of refugees requested by the UNHCR in previous conflicts. To offer only 10,000 suggests that the U.S.’s global leadership is weakening—a dangerous message to exhibit in today’s world.

Unfortunately, not all of Europe is as willing to assist as Germany is. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán was quoted in a German newspaper Saturday Sept. 12 saying that refugees entering the continent should go back to “where they came from.” In the Hungarian city of Roszke—which is near the Serbian border—refugees are held for over 36 hours in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions as they try to make it through lengthy registration lines.

Clearly, while some nations are willing to help stop the unnecessary deaths of thousands of Middle Eastern refugees, some—including the U.S.—are not doing enough. If the U.S. is to uphold its current position in global leadership, its stance on this issue will have to change quickly and dramatically.

In
Comment
Share

Zablonski: How to keep an open mind about intimidating professors

Several factors are taken into account when building a schedule: time, difficulty, credits and overall course load. This culminates every semester during the extremely stressful registration process. One of the most pivotal factors when assembling a schedule, however, is the professor.

Wild rumors surround some professors, leading to an unbalanced registration period in which one section of a class is completely full while another is nearly empty. Ending up with the “undesirable” professor may seem awful at first—but is it?

A class with empty seats certainly appears to suggest that a particular professor is inferior in some way, be it their enthusiasm, teaching style or a large workload. Even if you assume the rumors that fuel these lower class turnouts are true—which is a dangerous assumption—things may not be so bad.

Smaller class sizes mean increased individual attention. This may come in the form of less crowded office hours, the ability to ask more questions in class or even a more sincere, personable professor. And if the professor does not turn out to be as bad as suggested by registration rates and general student opinion, the class may even end up being the better option.

A truly lackluster professor can also force students to band together and form study groups. Becoming acquainted with classmates—especially those with a common major—will provide an invaluable resource that will last throughout one’s college career.

Understandably, many students confuse “bad” with “tough” when choosing a professor.  Sure, an easy A is always nice, but having to work for one isn’t a bad thing—and having to work hard can be more beneficial in the long run.

Having to master the material to pass a tough class helps prepare you to take higher-level courses in the same field and can help in other classes. For example, taking a writing class with a difficult professor will not only help you in other writing classes, but will also improve your writing for other non-related courses.

As hard as it is to admit, a professor may not be particularly bad or hard—a bad grade could be on the student. I remember having a professor who, in my opinion, assigned excessive amounts of reading and was exceptionally boring. Once I realized that most of my classmates were ahead on the reading and thoroughly enjoyed this professor’s lectures, I started to work much harder. It turns out that this professor was not assigning ridiculous amounts of work, but rather I was just not willing to put in the effort—something that I changed and has helped me ever since.

Still, some professors are worse than others. Almost all students will end up with a professor they are not too fond of at some point. In this situation, it is important to go into the class without any preconceived notions. By at least giving the professor a chance, the class may be better than expected.

Although they can be scary, try to ignore any rumors about professors this registration cycle. Chances are the rumors are not true and, even if the professor isn’t the greatest, it is possible to have a positive experience in the class. At the very least, it’ll make your choice during registration a little easier.

Comment
Share

Zablonski: Social host law may discourage students from seeking help

In a unanimous vote, the Village Board of Geneseo passed the Social Host Law on April 20. This law has—understandably—dismayed many college students. The law levies fines of up to $500 and possible jail time for anyone who hosts a party where alcohol or illegal drugs are given to a minor.

Read More
In
1 Comment
Share

Greek Week unites fraternal campus community

Greek life has recently come under criticism for some of its members’ irresponsible actions, leading to a general mistrust and wariness toward Greek organizations across the country. Geneseo’s annual Greek Week—a week of various activities meant to unite the Greek community and foster positive relationships among its members—helps to deter this negative reputation and illustrate the positive impact Greek life has on the Geneseo community.

Read More
Comment
Share

Zablonski: Quality over quantity: résumé bulking harms applicants

As college admissions and the job market become more competitive, the quality of one’s résumé is increasingly important. Often, our interests and activities do not constitute a stellar résumé, meaning many of us must participate in clubs or activities out of our field of interest to appear well-rounded.

Read More
Comment
Share